SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Seagate Technology
STX 265.55+3.8%Nov 3 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dwayne Hines who wrote (7718)12/2/2010 6:02:19 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) of 7841
 
Yes, Samsung makes sense to me. They wouldn't have anti-trust issues, and it would complement their SSD business. They would be number 1 in a jiffy, which at one time was their goal. I thought that that made more sense than any other option, including private equity.

However, the thing mitigating against that is that Samsung is a cheap buyer. That works sometimes, and doesn't other times. They bought Maxtor years and years ago on the cheap, and failed, selling it after years of losses (well, spinning it off to the public again). Luczo won't sell cheap, unless it is to himself, and he can't afford it by himself and the Board wouldn't approve anyway, especially after the last time they went private.

So they are on their own for the foreseeable future, unless Samsung decides to actually spend some money to be number one. It might not be a bad idea for them to do it, but it would require a change of mindset that I don't expect will happen.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext