SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 399.01+0.1%Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (69448)12/12/2010 1:37:35 PM
From: Hawkmoon1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 218640
 
They can't both be right. One of them must be wrong.

I'm not so black and white on it. Both can be right, because both have different perspectives on the issue.

I draw the line where such leaks might place innocent US citizens and/or military personnel, at risk..

But that's my "line in the sand", and others draw theirs differently.

Personally speaking, I KNOW there is exists a tremendous amount of information that is over-classified. Part of this is due to the entrenched bureaucracy that advocates classifying everything "just in case" it becomes sensitive at a later date. Part of it is also due to power politics and playing "I have a secret" and if you want to learn about it, you need to have proper access and need to know. That's power.

But, cynic that I am, there's also big business interests involved in declassifying that information years down the road. It takes a lot of manpower, reviewing historical intel reports, and making a personal judgement call on whether the information is no longer sensitive... The more stuff you classify now.. the more people you have to hire to declassify it years down the road... And the people you hire are often retired analysts, working as contractors.. Call it "job security".. ;p

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext