2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 399.01

+0.1%

Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (69593)	12/14/2010 11:48:50 AM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 218645

but there have been lots of hororr stories on workfare programs also.. ... they cannot be one size fits all.. .... Concur with this.. any government assistance program is best implemented at the local level, but with Federal oversight and local ombudsmen. There are many cases where workfare is difficult to implement. But at least the recipient should be required to engage in re-training programs. If the taxpayers are forced to give out money, there should be an ROI involved that benefits society. And it's important for the recipient to maintain their self-esteem. Very few reputable individuals want to be on the "dole". They would rather have a job and a vision for bettering themselves, if only for their family. Of course, there are those who just want to live on the efforts of others, but that's what workfare is designed to ferret out. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next