SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (9022)12/15/2010 5:48:26 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 10087
 
I am talking about speeding laws, private property rights, city councils decisions, planning departments, not being able to kill people-lol.

Which is why you said -

"Well, that is fine and dandy, but you also need a fully functioning society. And that requires people giving up some of their freedoms.

Like the freedom to kill-lol."

Message 27029347

??

I know you put a lol on the end of the initial statement, but you also put it on the end of your more recent post as well so the statements are equivalent. Also "lol" does not equal "ignore my entire statement that proceeds lol", it just an expression that your laughing.

You can have speeding laws and city councils, even to an extent planning departments, without giving up all that much in the way of freedom. Private property rights generally actually increase freedom. In any case you can have all of that while having much smaller government and more freedom than we currently have in the US. Also you can have all of that without having socialism. So I don't understand how "...but you also need a fully functioning society. And that requires people giving up some of their freedoms..." supports the concept of "libertarian socialism".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext