SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 249.89+3.1%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sun Tzu who wrote (24779)12/16/2010 1:14:57 AM
From: etchmeister  Read Replies (1) of 25522
 
they will tell you that the way to resolve it is to let them buy the tech they want and that will remove the trade deficit.
and when necessary they will steel it...
"breed" a communist with a capitalist ... what do you end up with?
Gerald Yin worked for Intel, than worked for Lam Research and than joined AMAT.
There are probably dozens of Gerald out there who returned to the Motherland.

Applied Materials, Chinese rival face legal battle
EE Times ^ | December 25, 2007

Posted on Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:04:24 PM by nwrep

Applied Materials Inc. and Chinese fab-tool rival Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Inc. (AMEC) have agreed to disagree over a confidentially motion filed as part of a bitter legal battle between the two companies.

Applied Materials (Santa Clara, Calif.) seeks to prove its suit against AMEC (Shanghai) by providing a confidential "trade-secret list" to select employees from the Chinese IC-equipment supplier. In a document filed in December of 2007, Applied Materials claims AMEC is resisting the move, thereby delaying the motion.

The motion is part of a suit filed by Applied Materials against China's AMEC in October of 2007. Applied's suit, filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California here, claims that AMEC is allegedly involved in misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract and unfair competition.

The co-defendants in the suit include several AMEC executives and former employees at Applied Materials: Gerald Yin, Aihua Chen, Ryoji Todaka and Lee Luo. In fact, the suit contends that 30 former Applied engineers now work at AMEC.

Founded in 2004, AMEC recently outlined its strategy. The company has entered the etch and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) markets, thereby putting itself in direct competition with Applied, Lam, TEL and others.

Founded in 1967 in California's Silicon Valley, Applied Materials creates and commercializes the nanomanufacturing technology and equipment that helps produce virtually every semiconductor chip and flat panel displays in the world. The company recently entered the market for equipment to produce solar arrays and energy efficient glass.

The co-defendants in the case were said to have worked at Applied at one time and had "access to highly sensitive Applied trade secrets" involving etch and CVD, according to the suit. "Defendants willfully breached multiple duties to Applied by transferring and converting Applied inventions and trade secrets to AMEC."

Yin is chairman and CEO of AMEC. At Applied, he held various positions from 1991 to 2004, including general manager of the etch products group, according to the suit.

In 2004, Yin resigned from Applied and moved to China. At that time, he and Chen co-founded AMEC. Chen, who is executive vice president at AMEC, held a number of roles at Applied, including general manager of the CVD products group, according to the suit.

In 2005, AMEC filed a patent in China, dubbed "Method and Apparatus for Processing Semiconductor Work Pieces." The patent number is 200510028563.2 or Chinese patent No. '563, according to the suit.

AMEC filed that patent in Japan and the United States, which are known as No. 2006-214829 (Japanese '829) and 11/441,291 (U.S. '291), respectively, according to the suit.

"The information disclosed in these patent applications include Applied confidential information, including Applied trade secrets," according to the suit. "AMEC has also misappropriated other Applied confidential information and trade secrets."

Applied is seeking damages in the suit. In the latest filing, issued on Dec. 21, Applied and AMEC are supposed to agree to a "stipulated protective order to govern documents produced in discovery."

The two companies cannot agree "as to whom and under what circumstances Applied's trade secret list can be shown," according to court documents. A hearing is expected to take place in January.

they will tell you that the way to resolve it is to let them buy the tech they want and that will remove the trade deficit.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext