IMGX, currently $3.50 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : IMGX, currently $3.50

IMGX 0.0001000

0.0%

Oct 28 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jay Morrison who wrote (500)	11/12/1997 7:36:00 AM
From: Constance K. Landis	Read Replies (1) of 665

Constance mumbled: <<How can you possibly even consider comparing IMGX to these other stocks?>> Because IMGX is a stock that is very similar to those stocks. You should re-read everything written previously so that you better understand the details. Your entire post demonstrates that you do not. Similar, yes they are both software companies, yes they have similar market caps. As for accelerated share value and profitability, clearly there is little to compare. <<No analyst worth a damn is going to promote this stock or for that matter any stock that perpetuates continued losses.>> That is not true. I have seen many companies perpetuate losses and be covered. Apple comes to mind. What a grand example. I only wish that IMGX will have as many profitable 1/4's. Apple remains "covered" due to their continued impact on personal computing and due to their historical growth. You seem obsessed to compare "apples(no pun intended) to lemons". <<Even mentioning it in the same vein with Microsoft is absolutely ridiculous. Come back to reality.>> Once again, you missed the point of WHY it was mentioned. MSFT and the others were mentioned to demonstrate that software companies can trade anywhere between 5x sales to as high as 10x sales. MSFT is currently 10x sales. FILE is currently 5.8x sales, but has been as high as 10x sales. There is nothing that is special about how Microsoft is judged. It is priced exactly the same as other software companies. By p/e and by revenue. They are simply the biggest. Using MSFT as an example is logical assuming that IMGX is a growth story. Missed the point, indeed. You were the one who stated "But this is all wishful thinking on my part". Again, your assumption that IMGX is "a growth story" is unsupported by real data. You failed to understand the basic concept that domestic (non-Dorotech) sales are growing and growing quite well. Dorotech will be gone by next month in my opinion. Q4 results will likely be stated in terms of IMGX only without Dorotech. US revenue last quarter was $6.5 million. It will at least be $7.4 million next quarter (Zannett target) and is likely to be around $8 million. That is a growth company that deserves to be rated as other software growth companies. What else does your crystal ball tell you? You continue to project based on assumptions. What makes you think they will unload Dorotech next month? An attempt to improve year end numbers? What new excuses for failed performance will they use without Dorotech?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next