SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: SteveF who wrote (4061)12/20/2010 7:45:39 PM
From: scionRead Replies (2) of 53574
 
Do you really think he paid $.50/share for 66k shares? That explains his arrival when the PPS was threatening to break $.50. Sneaky.

I believe you are right. Well caught.

If those were issued to the Expedite2 holders in Sep 2009 they'd be fully unrestricted now! The 6-month holding period would have been March-April when the PPS really began collapsing. The 9,970,000 number did not begin appearing in filings until the first restated 10K/A - the original and all previous filings simply referred to JB returning 10 million!

This is big for me because it explains the last missing pieces: my OS Timeline had an extra 10 million in the OS that I couldn't account for (because they were reissued to Expedite2 holders), their cost basis was around $.50 (if I read that right - might be an average), and these missing pieces have been hidden until the restatements.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News