Some published pieces have more utility than others. This one has a great amount of utility to those of us who undertake counterprogramming schemes.
Thanks for posting it.
To: critical_mass who wrote (69953) 12/24/2010 5:22:33 AM
From: elmatador of 69956
He can prove. Traders knows how buffer stocks work.
en.wikipedia.org
On first look many useful applications come to mind, so we will take it seriously and apply it within our purpose.
Gross systemics enable schemes, there can be no other conclusion about schemes, schemes are always a form of projected identification..
All schemes have utility, by understanding trigger points, observers with higher awareness, routinely profile the schemes developers. To profile any scheme requires understanding of tactics within the observed strategy, where iterated actions leave momentary tracks with only nuanced differences existing between schemes.
Good Quality schemes imbeds iteration, as an extension of the schemes useful life.
Bad schemes are quick ones where the originators are out in the open, exposed momentarily, to the extent that the scheme generates publicity, notoriety or simply, awareness from on lookers.
We already know that all Observation has effects.
Effects can be short lived or long lived.
Counterprogramming schemes, is strategic, and never motivated by short term ends.
Counter programming is about the conversion of awareness; from the single valuedness of all schemes designs, to conditions of multivaluedness where the schemers perception, is non functional.
This Non functionality, constitutes a deficit of awareness within given systems and thier inhabitants..schemes. |
