SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (596268)12/24/2010 9:18:09 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (2) of 1576165
 
Following Ted's lead, we should assume he likely didn't exist and was made up by later historians seeking to provide a historical base for the Hellenistic kingdoms that arose in the eastern Mediterranean region.

There are numerous surviving ancient Greek and Latin sources on Alexander, as well as some oriental texts. None is contemporary.
.....
The primary sources written by people who actually knew Alexander or who gathered information from men who served with Alexander, are all lost, apart from a few inscriptions and fragments.[1]
.....
The five main surviving accounts are by Arrian, Plutarch, Diodorus, Curtius and Justin.[1]


en.wikipedia.org

All of those historians wrote more than a century after Alexander's time. They asserted they wrote using earlier sources but those no longer exist.

Of course, I don't doubt Alexander existed. I'm just showing how silly Ted's argument is.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext