Evolution Message Board - Msg: 27059135

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (11707)	12/30/2010 11:14:05 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) of 69300

"women who wished that their children had been aborted" Did I say that the pregnancy came to term? If it didn't come to term, then why talk about it in this context? I thought you were talking about saving women whose life was doomed in some way by not being able to abort. but not that you equated "sanctity" with "value". Ah, its a distate for any word that sounds faintly religious? As a tenet of courteous conduct, might I recommend you frame your questions as questions, without provocations such as declarative structure or taking the name of the dark&mighty GOSH in vain. Okay, I'll put a question mark at the end. "There is a danger in taking life for humanitarian reasons." Doesn't apply in this instance. Nobody is threatening to take the lives of the persons in my example except the owner/operators. Do you agree or disagree that if the two criteria I mentioned are observed, it's admissible? That whats admissable? I recall forced sterilizations for eugenic reasons were once done in this country. I know that medical euthanasia began in the Netherlands within the last generation and was justified as a merciful voluntary thing. Now most medical euthanasia acts there are initiated by doctors with no authorization.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next