SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: E_K_S who wrote (40937)1/4/2011 9:20:54 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) of 78470
 
Oil land leases. Yes, the situation is complex. I find as an outsider, it's unfathomable. That's why I buy a basket of e&p stocks - large e&p and small, within a particular shale.

Other aspects which are important, that a package of such stocks may facilitate dealing with, are:

1. Bakken shale and some others extend across state lines as well as country. So we're dealing with various state and provincial laws regarding land use and rights.

2. Some leases (esp. some Canadian gov't) require the acquiring company to drill a certain amount in a certain period of time or else the leases will be rescinded. Which means somehow, the acquirer has got to have funding and has got to secure fracing crews to drill.

3. There are several layers in geological formations (levels of shale). In some states, drilling rights can be bought and sold on the particular geological formation, i.e. the particular layer in the earth. Thus, if some company says they've got land holdings in the Bakken, I have to assume (given my limited knowledge) it's not necessarily so that the holdings relate to that geological level which has been proven to be the productive oil layer.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext