View from the Center and Left Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: epicure who wrote (154113)	1/12/2011 4:11:06 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (2) of 541929

I mean what homeowner really needs that many rounds? With three attackers/burglars and FBI statistics to prove less than 50% of rounds find their target a fifteen round magazine is about the minimum required. But really, what's the excuse for giving that kind of firepower to regular folks. A black powder rifle? Sure- that's certainly consitutional. Deuling pistols? our founding fathers would approve. An uzi? I don't think so. You should probably read the Heller decision. as well as limiting the amount of damage one can do with a gun? It only takes one shot and magazine limits are not going to solve anything - they are already on the market by the millions. Couple guys showing how fast they can swap a magazine: youtube.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next