Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric who wrote (24901)	1/17/2011 5:58:15 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 86352

Ahhh.. so you are now the decider of who knows and doesn't?? Yeah.. when there are 32,000 scientists, including 9,000 PhD unwilling to sign on to ANY conclusions about GW/CC being promoted by the IPCC, I think it behooves us to listen to them. You've already made up your mind.. End of story. Case Closed.. No more discussion is warranted. I refuse to make up my mind and decide until I'm convinced all the relevant evidence is available and provides a credible case for EITHER side of the debate.. Thank god you're not a Judge. I can just imagine the kind of "Kangaroo Courts" you'd preside over and how many people would be convicted on the flimsiest of evidence. I want "beyond a reasonable doubt" before we convict and sentence our economy and civilization to the radical penalties you, and other GW'rs, are proposing to inflict upon humanity. I certainly don't want those decisions based upon "Preponderance of the (manipulated and cherry-picked) evidence". Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next