SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: longnshort who wrote (405784)1/21/2011 3:43:57 PM
From: Katelew2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 794009
 
Generally speaking, every country tries to manipulate its currency. China's looking out for itself and trying to combat it's own inflation by maintaining a strong currency. To expect China to willingly hurt itself and the standard of living of its own people is asking for China to behave irrationally just to help us out. Thus I'm not too enamoured of the the currency manipulation complaints.

The other complaints, though, about intellectual property right, patents, etc. are worthy, imo. I've read that Ambassador Jon Huntsman is making real progress on these issues. Many people don't realize that China came out of the Mao rule without a Western style body of law and court system. Ever since it has been trying to build a legal framework for itself that is rational, will stand the test of time, and will be able to adjudicate issues like patent law. I'm not trying to make excuses for China--just saying that this is a huge country that has modernized itself at a breakneck pace without a body of law in place. Historically, the usual pattern has been for a country's economy and it's rule of law to evolve more or less simultaneously.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext