SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DMaA who wrote (17641)1/28/2011 1:08:56 PM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) of 24758
 
We, you and I, already got into this on this thread in #14159, but was touched upon in #9656, and in #14379.

Also, I commented extensively about high cirrus in summer of '09 and about its meteorological implications. I photographed the phenomenon then.

If you'll remember, I provided a mechanism for noctilucents having to do with muon cascades, solar wind, and cosmic rays. Scafetta has an interesting model as given at various places in this thread. And there's, #17183.

Article says, "Colder temperatures allow more water to freeze, while an increase in water vapor allows more ice clouds to form."

Nope. Increase in water vapor doesn't have anything to do with ice cloud formation. There is no water vapor at such heights. Clouds there are necessarily ice of some form given the temperature. After all, the article says, "The clouds form only when temperatures drop below minus 200 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 130 degrees Celsius), when the scant amount of water high in the atmosphere freezes into ice clouds." The scant amount of water can only exist as ice, ice in different forms depending upon temperature, since at that height the temperature never rises above -100 degrees.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext