SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (32059)2/5/2011 10:21:11 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Wharfie, the reason you should find that amazing Peer Reviewed publishing about "The Science" is because it's your claim that there is Global Warming in action, not mine. You claim, "There are little green goblins at the bottom of the garden." I say there are not. Since The Science is supposedly indisputable, it must be to hand somewhere.

I doubt there is The Science about it.

If somebody claims some theory is true, then they should have the evidence to hand. McIntyre wanted to check the data, but the Mann Made Warming gang wouldn't give him the data to check. "You just want to find fault with it."

You say "The Science" is indisputable, the facts are in, the argument is over. Okay then, show us the peer reviewed facts about CO2 subduction by the Gulf Stream.

I don't wish to do "homework" on crackpot theories of which there are millions. Fortunately, few of the crackpots get all the way to mainstream mania dragging me into their mania, forcing me to pay for their creationist cult.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News