Appreciate your concession (technically it is a 10K not an 8K-- understand this is all new to you, no worries).
jimmenknee Share Saturday, February 05, 2011 7:19:43 PM
Re: Justice37 post# 91920 Post # of 91932
Appreciate your concession (technically it is a 10K not an 8K-- understand this is all new to you, no worries).
Quote:
I am not convinced about your claim regarding the "mystery million" in JBI-DE. I looked at other evidence given to me and I have to agree you missed something.
Totally fine-- you don't have to be convinced by me. The data speaks for itself.
Quote:
It's not an issue I own, you are discussing with another person posting.
Of course it was/is yours-- the origin was your assertion: "... JBI will have two clean bills of health in regards to their books, one by Withum, Smith and Brown, and now by E&Y. It means an end to the shady book keeping accusations which were always nonsense. ..." #msg-59402778
I offered linked proof that is now refuted by secret DD provided by someone else. So now your "nonsense" assertion is supported by way of second-hand secret DD-- okay -- but you still own the issue at origin.
Quote:
He's going to make you work for it just like he has in the past.
lol I didn't need to work for it in the past although I do appreciate the opportunity to hone skills every now and again. I thought you got that the last go around was based on their false claims that John bought the $1 shares for $3-- which then flip-flopped once I challenged their not being a part of John's (personal) filed holding. Sorry if you missed the irony of the schooling effort.
Quote:
I hope you are open minded enough to see that JBI just might be what they and others posting on this board, say it is.
I am not firmly in either extreme camp; but all the research I have done points to a lot more challenges that will impact the share price in the short to medium term as well as threaten the ability to sustain/grow this (latest morphed) business model.
Quote:
Doesn't hurt to say you were wrong about something, I do it all the time, helps me to learn and grow as a person.
No disagreement from me on this either-- bring on the DD, legitimately prove me wrong, and I will admit it as well as thank those responsible for helping me grow. Otherwise, the posts do nothing to forward the discussion WRT the dynamic (duly noting that is not the intended focus anywaze)
siliconinvestor.com
Justice37 Share Saturday, February 05, 2011 3:14:26 PM
Re: jimmenknee post# 91911 Post # of 91932
In regards to the way I read the amended 8-K, I was completely wrong. WSB's audit of the 2008 accounting was in relation to 310 Holdings. As to if they looked at aspects of JBI's business in relation to Delaware and Canada, I see some evidence it was accounted for in relation to the JBI-NV books but no evidence they were audited by WSB. You made your point.
I don't want to belittle my above admission you were right by doing a "yes but no" so please understand I just pointing out another aspect of my last post. I am not convinced about your claim regarding the "mystery million" in JBI-DE. I looked at other evidence given to me and I have to agree you missed something. It's not an issue I own, you are discussing with another person posting. He's going to make you work for it just like he has in the past. I hope you are open minded enough to see that JBI just might be what they and others posting on this board, say it is. Doesn't hurt to say you were wrong about something, I do it all the time, helps me to learn and grow as a person.
siliconinvestor.com |
