The Environmentalist Thread Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (32497)	2/20/2011 12:48:10 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) of 36917

>"There is no theory or result that indicates that climate change increases extremes in general." I want to see a link to the original document showing the context of this statement. Too often you wingnuts distort the truth by outright lying or quoting out of context. >As Luboš Motl (one of the world's premier physicists) explains in his article, the global warming theory better supports the claim that less severe climate extremes will be the result of warming. Why? AGW theory calls for the polar areas to warm more rapidly than the tropical areas. That result means the temperature difference between polar and tropics is lessened. If the temperature difference shrinks, the potential for severe weather shrinks also. Motl is not a climate scientist, but a Physicist studying string theory. He's a climate skeptic and is clearly biased with his political ideology on the topic. That statement is an overly simplistic analysis of the problem and obviously has some problems. >UN's IPCC political agenda Then your "source" starts going into it's political diatribe, showing its true colours and bias. They are liars and distorters, like you are.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next