SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JBTFD who wrote (304516)2/28/2011 11:24:49 AM
From: ValueproRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
"If you really care about rule of law you should be (...concerned about the past)."

Either you misunderstand me, or I'm not clear on your response, so let me say this. I do not believe that any president is upholding his constitutionally prescribed duties when he can chose which laws he will enforce and which ones he will not. That such has happened in the past does not excuse it, and something should be done to ensure that no president can do this in the future.

What has happened in the past under other presidents can not be undone, especially if you consider the fact that what one president does in regards to his/her personal objections to enforcing the law is highly unlikely to be binding upon a subsequent president.

And, if this continues to be allowed, why should it remain limited (as it seems to have been) to new legislation? Why not any legislation? How dangerous is that?

VP in AZ
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News