The Residential Real Estate Crash Index Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JBTFD who wrote (304564)	2/28/2011 2:43:29 PM
From: Valuepro	Read Replies (2) of 306849

"It is a mixed message to say we should have the current president enforce all laws while at the same time saying that past presidents should be exempt from consequences of not enforcing all laws." I think I am still having trouble with what you are saying, or you are seeing things in what I've said that I do not intend. "exempt from consequences"? All I'm talking about is forcing a sitting president and all future holders of the office to do their duty. I'm not even thinking of punishment/consequences. Besides, what is the term, ex post facto? You can't punish anyone for breaching laws that didn't exist at the time of their act which later became illegal. Or, are you really trying to say that we can't force a sitting president and future presidents to obey the law, because previous ones may not have?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next