Hi Terry,
Why is that "youth" appears to misread all that is said, it seems to me you missed some of the positive things (and at your age I would have expected better, tsk, tsk).
As I said to Graystone earlier, the main message appears again to have been missed. Consider your age, experience, credibility etc and then you can measure the influence you have on readers of your posts. If you would consider these aspects of yourself then perhaps you will understand why the likes of Allan Greenspan has to pick his words carefully. You cannot, given the fine things I just stated about you, and particularly now I know your relative age speculate without knowing you have a wide audience. Based on these aspects, then pick your words carefully, that's all. In other word's consider what "innocent" or inexperienced investors might do when reading your speculative musings. Oh, by the way there's a lot more to be discovered in Labrador, a hell of a sight more, maybe not tomorrow, but eventually.
Feline by the way is another matter, feline does not talk like a woman, so unless you have met feline and can attest to sex (and age) I don't particulary buy feline's story about "itself".
Anyway I don't have much time for people that hide behind psuedonyms, moths have bigger balls than that.
Regards, Terence Mitchell
PS. Regarding your comments about years of experience (I worked on the Inco Thompson "Development" before it was a producing mine) but this is totally irrelevant information and has no place in what we were talking about. |
