TJ,
Your attempts to "understand by paraphrasing" are nothing more than the usual attempts to evade and divert the discussion away from uncomfortable questions or subject matter. As you know from our prior discussions, I will not follow you down that path.
You ask, what is my point? I'll repeat & summarize. Chinese actions in Tibet resulted in the death, torture, imprisonment and labor camp internment of many hundreds of thousands of people. End of story. Doesn't matter what the reason was, this statement is factual and true. Don't you agree that this is a true statement? Don't go pointing fingers at other countries, please just answer the question.
BTW, all this talk about running dog lackeys, imperialists , baby skin, nazi-loving lamas, foreign pig dogs ...etc reminds me of the drivel that Mao's people used to rant. Speaking of Mao, this gives me an opportunity to develop a thought using your own logic as expressed in numerous of your posts over the last few days.
Let's see, instead of feudalism, baby skin, British/American lackeys & brutal Tibetans, let's substitute:
- Red Guards beating, torturing, killing many untold thousands.
- cannibalism in Guangxi province during the Cultural Revolution.
- female baby infanticide, forced abortions.
- millions killed to ensure the ascendancy of & continued rule of a megalomaniac ruler.
- pathetic policy decisions that resulted in the deaths of tens of millions.
Based on this exercise & employing your logic, then:
"Maybe the early arriving Chinese along with some other ethnically-related country should have invaded China to spare their later-arriving brethren the horrors of being subjected to the whims of a psychopath and being forced to live under communist rule as dictated by the red chinese and their communist henchmen such as russia, n. korea, albania, e.germany ...etc."
So if you feel that Tibet needed to be liberated than surely you can see that conditions in China were such that liberating it would have relieved the suffering of millions. Correct?
|
