Mar. 4 you posted:
Message 27210413
In which you quoted Loftus as stating that “I do not believe anything is intrinsically good.” You then attempted to insinuate that his relative position on moral values somehow disqualified his relative expressions of moral umbrage against the Christian supernatural leader known as Yahweh.
I pointed out to you that your position was nonsensical, as human beings have not only the right but the duty to make moral judgments, and that your belittling attitude derived from abject and contemptible ignorance of the matter.
You then responded with a lie on Mar. 6 where you stated that both myself and Loftus continued to pronounce the actions of others as “intrinsically evil”.
I responded that I had never done so and that NOTHING in the article you had posted made any such attribution to Loftus. Indeed, the remarks available to us in the article were very clear in defining Mr. Loftus’s position as NOT believing that good and evil were intrinsic attributes.
So you had created an OUTRIGHT lie once again! I responded to you by pointing this obvious fact out and stating VERY clearly:
“I don't know what post you are responding to. I made no such reference and I have gone back to your post and your link and put "intrinsically" into the "find" box and nothing remotely resembling your accusation comes up--not even in the comments. Yet you put it in quotes as though either I or Mr. Loftus had made such claims? Hmmmm…“
You responded on Mar. 7 siliconinvestor.com
...with your normal dissembling and vituperative misdirection--together with the expected (from you) mixture of ad hominems, vicious lies, insinuations and irrelevancies--and potty mouth delirium disease.
I responded to your verbal diarrhea and your ugly sociopathic lies with a complete exposure of the utter stupidity of your accusations and the very plain fact that NOT believing in intrinsic evil means NOT...and it does NOT ( :-) ) mean the opposite--as you continued to claim in your imbecilic way!
siliconinvestor.com
You then responded on Mar. 8 with more psychotic misrepresentation and utterly bizarre lies!
siliconinvestor.com
“whom you denied ever used the words, "intrinsically good". “
Psychotic liar! Loftus said he DID NOT BELIEVE anything was intrinsically good! I pointed that out to you several times and I’ve just put the entire record down on SI once again!! From your original post:
“David, I am a consequentialist. I do NOT believe anything is intrinsically good.“
Bolding mine!
When I pointed this out to you and rationally proved that having moral values and proclaiming the relative values one holds regarding actions was not incompatible with the held principle that values are always derived from opinion and circumstance--all you had to do was admit this was so and that your original accusation against Loftus was simply you being thoughtless and running your head once again. However, you’ve gone into your dumb idiot act of moving quotes around and “losing your place” in the discussion as you misdirect and obscure and fumble and stick-handle through your own lies and fabrications.
You might fool some people. There are undoubtedly people on SI who are too dumb to follow something as simple as the difference between believing something and NOT believing something! I hope such people can make your sorry and miserable existence worthwhile!
My opinion is not only that you are frightfully disturbed and extremely dumb--but that you are a worthless human being. Your inability to be truthful for even the space of a single post--even ONCE--shows that you really have no value. That, at least, is my judgement.
Feel free to disagree, but the facts are there in the last six posts--as well as the last several thousand! People who cannot deal straight but deliberately and perversely misrepresent are worthless in my books.
So once again: I have NEVER said that evil and good were intrinsic or Absolute. I have ALWAYS over thousands and thousands of posts stated that evil and good are just linguistic representations of helpful and hurtful--opinions that stem wholly from subjective perspective and frame.
This has always been your chief hatred of me so it is quite amusing to see you now pretending the opposite!! :-) |
