Value Investing Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jurgis Bekepuris who wrote (41765)	3/15/2011 6:33:11 PM
From: Mark Marcellus	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 78572

IMHO, it is very sad that most of the world will have knee-jerk reaction to nuclear problems in Japan and stop investing in nuclear energy or decommission existing nuclear plants. As always there will be unwarranted knee jerk stuff, and yes everything has risks, but... - The long term effects of a nuclear disaster are much worse than the alternatives. When that gas pipe exploded in California, devastating a neighborhood, everyone but the people whose houses were destroyed was able to move back in a matter of days, not years. - There are reasonable concerns about the ability of the industry to model for disaster risk. If a Japanese company was unable to fully anticipate what was, in retrospect, a fairly obvious earthquake scenario where a major earthquake is followed by a tsunami, what scenarios are they missing in other places? - One clear risk that needs to be reexamined is keeping the spent fuel next to the reactor. It sounds like that was the major problem causing radiation leaks.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next