SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (41783)3/16/2011 9:10:37 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (1) of 78958
 
I disagree. I believe that the risks are known and calculable. I furthermore believe that the risks did not become worse because of the current situation in Japan. It seems that you don't think so. I don't think we can reconcile these two views, so I don't see a point in further discussion. :)

BTW, I agree that the safety can be improved in part by not building nuclear reactors in the path of tsunami and not storing spent nuclear fuel on the premises. But safety improvement only reduces the risks and not increases them. ;)
If we had to talk about increased risks, corruption and shoddy building in China nuclear plants would be more appropriate topic, though shoddy building affects a lot of industries and could lead to mass deaths in any number of them.

Peace. :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News