SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (41783)3/16/2011 9:58:28 AM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) of 78594
 
re Nuclear energy -first of at, the question for this board is not what is a rational way to pursue (or not) nuclear energy. That decision will be made by voters and politicians in various countries. The relevant question is what is likely going to happen with nuclear energy and how can I profit from it (or at least avoid losses). My thinking is that the buildout of nuclear energy is going to stall in many countries and that this will have a severe effect for the business involved.

The other thing is that operating older plants may be more dangerous than assumed. Those plants that failed in Japanese coincidentally or not were older plants. Now most of the operators like EXC and ETR or others really like to operate those older, cheap and depreciated plants because they are so profitable, but I would expect that this operating model will be severely challenged and these plants will be decommissioned sooner now. So EXC and ETR can say goodby sooner rather than later to these immensely profitable cash cows.

Also, keep note that these nuclear power generation business fall into the unregulated wholesale business, so there is no support from the taxpayer or customer either (as would be the case if the plant is within the regulated business).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext