International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lew Green who wrote (26034)	11/14/1997 1:51:00 PM
From: KVASIR	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Lew, If the news is positive & verifies-doesn't that relieve the necessity for "the lawyers being meticulous"? I can understand how important it is, and for the wording to be correct, but this concerns me....If it's bad, or if the amounts are there but less, or the opt./ton levels are far less than thought, that would clearly explain the necessity for tiptoeing in. Or can it be possible that amounts are there, but BD doesn't see extraction as economically feasible?? I'm just trying to understand, not being negative or instigating like Chatters.....but totally positve news, to my admitted rookie experienced opinion, would seem to negate the necessity for extra-special attention to the release. It also seems that good news released on Friday afternoon never carries as much momentum into the following week......of course Gold bungee jumping down again today hasn't helped either......Thank you......Nervous Nellie

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next