TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JDN who wrote (6000)	11/14/1997 4:43:00 PM
From: C.K. Houston	Read Replies (3) of 31646

JDN, < I would like more comment on FLUOR deciding internally to not push Y2K work. What exactly does that mean? It could be very good. Could it mean that rather than take a high profile in the Y2K work that they will merely recommend TPRO to their customers who need it?? Surely there has to be a reason for the alliance in the first place?> Corporate Politics. Image. Ego. Read the 1st part of this link again. (Skip the intro paragraph.) Explains why Fluor wanted ... and needed the TPRO alliance. Couldn't get their database together .... TPRO was far further ahead. Time's running out. Considering the urgency of the situation, the fact that there is a definite deadline, the year 2000, Fluor figured it made sense to team up with TPRO. This also bears on potential competition. Time is a barrier to entry in this field. Also one guy said that Fluor was concerned about liability with respect to Y2K. And that's why they were interested in teaming with TPRO. No wonder Owens came from Fluor to TPRO. Smart guy. techstocks.com Cheryl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next