Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Katelew who wrote (421323)	4/12/2011 12:15:39 AM
From: mistermj	8 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793964

Katelew this is the crux of the argument as I understand it. The "Certification of Live Birth" posted online and widely touted as "Obama's birth certificate" does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same "short-form" document (is/was?) easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true "long-form" birth certificate – which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician – is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for the public or press. In a nutshell...Obama supporters often do not realize the difference, or are ok with the rubber stamped response that he provided a certified legal document, which is true but possibly misleading. Birthers will not accept that the legal document (Cert. of Live Birth) actually provides proof of where he was born, because the young state of Hawaii in the early 60's was known to issue Cert. of Live Birth by request with just a signature from parent or legal guardian, as I understand it.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next