International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Furry Otter who wrote (26212)	11/14/1997 6:35:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (3) of 35569

>>Funny, the highest value reported was COC...what are the others doing in there, anyway? Anybody care to comment?<< Sure ... Bateman inserted some non-CoC samples that were taken by IPM ... This proves the samples taken by IPM were NOT tampered with as the results are within the ranges of the samples that are CoC. Taking a truly random sample for statistical analysis within a desired coefficient of error ... requires a much smaller number of samples than you might imagine. If the 8 samples were taken on a random basis from what may have been 100 samples (my number!) ... 8 samples is all you need to get a true evaluation.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next