SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (607892)4/15/2011 2:37:34 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1583171
 
>>> You are making an excellent case for why these costs would go up if paid for by a private insurer...

This is nonsense. Private insurers today pick up the tab, via cost-shifting, for underpayments from Medicare/Medicaid. There is nothing at all to suggests privatization would do anything other than REDUCE health care costs.

In very limited areas a practice can operate with only Medicaid and/or Medicare fees. For example, Mental Health clinics are vastly overpaid by Medicaids around the country, which has created rampant fraud in these areas. Similarly, NET (non-emergency transportation) has been been abused in many states.

However, as a general proposition, a physician's practice CANNOT SURVIVE on Medicare and Medicaid fees. Today, they aren't even paying fixed overhead costs for operating a medical practice. Which means that even shuffling patients to PAs and APNs is not a viable long-term arrangement.

>> You are making an excellent case for why these costs would go up if paid for by a private insurer...

You keep saying this but you cannot support it with a cogent argument.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext