International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Donald Watson, Jr. who wrote (26138)	11/14/1997 7:44:00 PM
From: puzzlecraft	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Don, > those numbers look GReeeaaatttt!!!! What happened to the talk of .25+ opt gold with whispers that the real figures were much higher? What a letdown. IPM says "As part of this program Bateman will also be providing the expertise to assist in the development of a cost-effective process to extract metals." That means IPM doesn't have a cost effective method now. Will they ever? I recall talk that IPM did. Maybe that was for .25+ opt. Now it's 12 to 18 more months to come up with a resource statement, then more financing to go ahead with planning. Remember in the Jan 1997 President's letter, the goal was to have a resource statement this year? Talk, delay, issue more stock. Been going on for years and will go on for years. I have no regrets for recently bailing out of this one despite the disappointing prices. I was hoping to buy back in on the strength of a super report. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next