>>Some things that are not secret conspiracies are the functional equivalent of them. Sometimes those in power, acting independently, want the same things even though they are morally wrong, corrupt, illegal etc...<<
absolutely true.
>>The creation of the Federal Reserve was not a conspiracy.
It was the result of the financial elite, war mongers, and left wing government expansionists all wanting a way to finance their agenda and politicians realizing that raising taxes would get them throw out of office. So the only way to satisfy everyone was to print money and confiscate wealth from the public in a way that most could not understand (inflation).<<
that fits the definition of a conspiracy to a T.
"a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose"
there is a combination of persons and the intent to achieve secret results.
why do you say that isn't a conspiracy? is that because of the emotional baggage that has been associated with the word in order to better enable conspiracies and shout down people who point them out WITH FACTS?
of course there are looney toon conspiracies, but that doesn't make all conspiracies looney toon. we have to think them through, ponder the incentives, and ponder the evidence.
or we could do, as nadine has done, lie about sources and move on.
>>Wall ST has a way to create bubbles, profit, and then socialize the downside (a giant rape and pillage machine).<<
nadine thinks this is, apparently, just blind luck.
>>The oil giants, global corporations, and Wall St have their imperialistic war machine creating new markets, stealing natural resources, etc..<<
blind luck.
>>The socialists have their bankrupt welfare state.<<
it just happened, nobody ever planned it out. that would be a conspiracy.
>>The politicians lie about inflation and blamed external things.
The public takes it where the sun never shines. No conspiracy. It's out in the open and very clear for anyone to see. <<
the actual act might be visible, but all the eventual nuances are secret. for example, there is no doubt the federal reserve is criminal and broke the law.
nadine never explains how this fact can be lost on each and every establishment organization. she says youtube (err, fox news -lol-) criticizes the fed, but can't produce what doesn't exist - them calling the fed out for criminally breaking the law. h*ll, fox has never even told the people what the fed mandate really is - they just lie about it.
they aren't stupid. they can read. they have an agenda.
anyone that doesn't think so can feel free to communicate the true mandate to any of their favorite Big Capital media puppets and they still won't tell anyone.
the media is controlled. the corporation explains how it works quite well. it is why boeing advertises when they don't sell to the public - they are effectively bribing the stations to keep bad news off the airwaves, just like monsanto did with fox.
i simply tell the truth as i see it, along with supporting data, and i don't care if other people can't wrap their heads around it or simply make up lies to avoid dealing with the truth - even to the point of simply lying to avoid an actual debate of the issues. |
