International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: O. H. Rundell who wrote (26170)	11/14/1997 10:02:00 PM
From: redbeardog	Read Replies (1) of 35569

O. H. Rundell: first i'ld like to apologize to you and Charles Bankes for my rather abrupt posts earlier today. after some time to settle down, i have some observations. first, ipmcf has basically the same assay numbers as previously reported. there is now coc on these numbers. that's a plus. assay numbers are not close to what was anticipated on this thread. i believe the thread represents public sentiment in this case and the that the general public will not be overly thrilled with this report. that's a big minus. i do not know how the funds will take this report. in the end they will determine price direction. i don't like the sound of the convertible debt, but will reserve judgement until i get a chance to read the terms. i hope the company will issue an additional release(s) this weekend to provide shareholders with additional information so that we can make an informed decision. i think i know what will happen monday, but will not finalize plans until as late as possible. regards, redbeardog

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next