Oblivious, where you taught that the Federal Reserve has been engaged in black letter law breaking criminal activity for the last 25 years?
i think the answer is pretty clear that they didn't teach you this. i would expect them to keep it hidden.
what I don't know is why it is so hard for you to say, "no, they didn't teach me that and i don't know that to be true. it sounds pretty out there, but if you can prove they broke the law, do share the evidence so i can evaluate it myself."
you started out this exchange by lobbing the "take an economics class" ad hominem at me. it was a blatant personal attack designed to impress that i was economically illiterate. you didn't cite any evidence of such, though.
that's classic ad hominem.
oh, this is interesting... a 4.0 yale econ graduate, taught by nobel prize winners no less (2 students even!), doesn't know the federal reserve has broken black letter law for 25 years running and an accused economical illiterate does...
yes, i can see the problem in that little situation you've created for yourself.
truth is more important to me than ego, so this kind of situation doesn't present itself to me. then again, i want to deal in issues and not personal attacks - and starting out on the right foot tends to avoid these awkward (for some, anyway) situations.
you know, maybe it was the econ classes that were the problem, not the solution. i was never taught that the federal reserve criminally broke the law for 25 years, i had to seek it out on my own, read the law for myself and compare it to the federal reserve's own data (in chart form) to discover they broke the law for 25 years running.
i didn't do it for ego or money, i did it because i care about the truth and despise criminal organizations, like the federal reserve, that destroy the lives of others by design. |
