Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (25969)	11/15/1997 12:26:00 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) of 1584598

Bill, re<V.D and K5> Just looking at the time line, it is apparent that he has nothing in common with the failure of K5 project. As for K6/Nx686 transition and organizing the way to market, if it is called "time manager", I agree. I already formulated my observations in: exchange2000.com I only want to reiterate that AMD has had a good working and competitive chip at 233Mhz. IMHO, it would require some tiny gradual design optimization to be a stable 233/2.8/0.35 product, profitable enough to support further developments and shrinks. It should be done something extremely wrong to kill the chick and miss 2 quarters of full-scale production, at most critical time for AMD. And he seems to be in charge for the overal execution. Of course, there is another man, Atiq Raza, who must be equally responsible for the K6 technical aspects, and his role in this failure is not clear to me. Ali

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next