International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bob Jagow who wrote (26368)	11/15/1997 2:04:00 AM
From: Alan Vennix	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Bob, Just a comment related to a post you made earlier relating the FA numbers from today's PR to the numbers reported in Dec 95, I believe. I think it important to differentiate between the two tests as far as actual numbers are concerned. The earlier numbers represented recovery numbers from IPM's early leach process (if memory serves correctly) - the numbers today are fire assay results on the head ore. Not that there shouldn't be some type of correlation, possibly, but the different types of testing should be kept in mind. Regards, Alan

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next