Skeeter: you missed my point. Anytime on any of these threads, whenever someone speaks out against a stock, the longs ALWAYS react the same way. I think it's something that SI requires when you join. :-)
Th way that you all presented yourselves, if I remember, was in such a manner that you all never really said anything.
Lets assume that what Mike says is true. Mike knows I really don't care.
Tonight, is the first time that anything has been said that was concrete. And, in true tradition..on the weekend.
Why not on Wed? people could have researched, made phone calss etc etc. Your timing has always been bad, but good if you want to make a case that it was a deliberate thing.
Why couldn't information been presented in such amanner as this: This is what I think..Because..this is what backs up my thinking..
Your arguments were always presented in such a manner as to elicit an argument in return.
I lost money on AAm. bought at 22, and sold at 19. I bailed the day after earnings came out, I knew the stock was going south quicker than a new yorker goes to fla in the winter.
There was a fellow that posted recently about the stock. He presented his argument in a detailed, clear concise manner. I am sure the people there appreciated it. Why couldn't you all have done this..Because it was more fun to do it the way you all did it. Sorry guys, I am not mad at the information, but I am mad at the messengers.
You all really did a disservice to a lot of people.
This all should have come out when you knew it.
saying do you own due dilly, really isn't an answer. some pople don't know how. If you rteally want to help people you do it by sharing information, freely. and as much as it hurts, if you have to repeat it for someone who isn't as skilled as you are you should do it, anyway.
As far as I am concerned it's a closed issue with me.
I think I've said enough on the matter. al |
