Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DMaA who wrote (424076)	4/28/2011 8:02:35 PM
From: alanrs	4 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 794206

If I cut and paste a lot of bits of information on a piece of paper and then scan it, I have a scan of a constructed document. I then give it to you. If you then scan the scanned piece of paper, you have an accurate scan of the scan. That's all he's saying, that AP didn't mess with what was given them, they just scanned it. Says nothing about the original. I must say that this was of little interest to me until he released whatever it is he released. It has gotten much more interesting since then. Having been married to a reasonably good con at one point (god rest her soul), who had a flare for calligraphy and knew her way around a copying machine, I'm surprised at this. Not to mention it would be much more believable if there had been added some detail that might be a little personally embarrassing to provide cover for the years it was withheld at great expense. A better forgery and some embarrassing detail included and this goes away. As it is, people will be pondering this for decades ala the grassy knoll with JFK, or the third person at Oklahoma City. ARS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next