Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (424085)	4/28/2011 8:56:54 PM
From: alanrs	Read Replies (1) of 794321

I realized after my post that I had dated myself badly. I don't think in terms of photo shop and computer generation. The idea remains the same. It almost had to be intentional. I can see this passing a quick glance, but they had to know it would be looked at carefully. The whole country got a good education on that with the Dan Rather/National guard documents. Who knows, maybe that paper is no longer made. Maybe the typewriter used back then can't be matched. Maybe there is something special about the print on a blank form. Maybe Obama could only trust Michelle or some other trusted ally to do the job. It has piqued my curiosity. ARS

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next