Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Carolyn who wrote (424179)	4/29/2011 2:54:22 PM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Read Replies (4) of 794387

Let me try it one more time. I'm just referring to the information presented in the video linked by Tom. Message 27341135 According to the presenter, (from 0:35 until 3:30) there are two separate PDFs. The one everyone is focusing on that has clearly and outrageously been tampered with. But there is a second one that has not been. According to the presenter there is no sign of tampering on that one. And the information on both the PDFs are essentially the same. So I don't understand the point of dissecting the dirty PDF when there is also a clean one available. Yes, it is granted that the WH version has been messed with. But so what?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next