International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (26427)	11/15/1997 12:34:00 PM
From: Bruce McGaughey	Read Replies (1) of 35569

There does seem to be a wide gulf in the Desert Dirts between the assay numbers and the recovery numbers. I wonder when we'll see a third party sign-off on RECOVERY ??? I think Bateman is the big key, here. BD was not willing to take the lead, here. They did take IPM's money.They didn't help with the reovery verification. I didn't go to the AGM. I did watch Al Vennix' tape of it, though. I can't imagine good people like Sam Shaw, Tom Dodge, Bill Allred, etc, involved in anything close to being a scam. I still believe Hoare's report. I still believe there's more out there than what's coming out of the fire assays. You miners out there, am I wrong ??? Is there always a direct correlation between assay and recovery ?? But......when are we going to get sign-off on RECOVERY ?????? Where's the magical, new-tech process ??? Are we STILL tweaking it ???

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next