International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (26487)	11/15/1997 5:45:00 PM
From: kimberley	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Zeev, I think you can be counted as impartial... you were in when you thought it would go up, and out when you thought it would go down. And honest about it. Someone who is just trying to make money, without any other agenda, is impartial. I think your take is right on, also. A lot of it depends on how much weight the market gives the fire assay. IPM didn't get the numbers it wanted, but it got coc on fire assay. That is a step, but don't know if it's enough to help right now. Interesting day Monday will be, eh? Do you know how long the company has to file the details of the financing with the sec? best, kim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next