International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: reg who wrote (26508)	11/15/1997 6:46:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (6) of 35569

Some of you folks are getting real mixed up about the fire assay and what is really there. This fire assay is brand new and the ONLY one that is repeatable(and therefore usable.) They announced a fire assay after the the AGM that read .1+. After a lot of testing, it proved unreliable. After some tinkering, I expect that this new one will improve. The extraction process with the .25 numbers appears to have the same problems. It doesn't give reliable and repeatable numbers so Bateman isn't going to make any sign offs on it. Does that mean the metals aren't there?? Of course not - just that the process needs work or that a new process needs to be devised.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next