International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: reg who wrote (26508)	11/15/1997 10:10:00 PM
From: bistineau_la	Read Replies (1) of 35569

<.036 is about 1 gram/ton. Marginal at best > Yes but don't confuse this with the real extraction rates. We have seen over and over that the DD fire assay numbers are much less than extraction rates. I read the press release last PM and have spent part of todat reading this thread. I am very impressed with this group. A very intelligent and tight nit group, Can't help but respect the folks here. There are a few exceptions such as Chatters and Grasshole. As most of you have expressed, I was dissappointed with the numbers presented in the report. Thinking back though, we would have given an arm and leg a few months back for a COC. We have it now. Our expectations had been set higher with the extraction results at the AGM. Just wish the press release had contained more assurance that the fire assay numbers don't correlate well with extraction numbers. Hopefully that will come soon. Also look forward to the PT numbers. Best to all. Julius

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next