International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (26583)	11/15/1997 10:46:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Read Replies (2) of 35569

<<<at least two times to confirm >>> I doubt if science would consider that as repeatability. Perhaps 200 times would qualify. >>>show no degradation of gold recovery.">>> An excellent point - what if the results Bateman got back all came out with much larger numbers NOT degraded ones ??? I am looking for reasons that Bateman did not release numbers. They know the metals are there and reported same. Im my opinion, the numbers came back all over the place, but that's just my opinion. I haven't asked the company. My sources tell me that Naxos is having that same problem - numbers from little to very large. Johnson has reportedly gone back to Ledoux to try to work thru the problems. For accurate input, I would suggest that you contact IPM.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next