Nayson,
I now have to comment, and if you want to question my integrity go ahead and start.
Firstly, Tom's comments were directed to specific issues toward IKE, and they were logical. Yes, it did get heated to higher levels, but it was done mutually by both parties.
Your attact on Tom, an extremely aggressive one, is totally uncalled for. Granted the exchanges between IKE and TT got heated, but you have now taken this to another degree far beyond the elevation IKE and TT brought it to, since you are now basicly calling TT a liar. Of course you did not use those exact words; however it is strongly implied in your post.
I do not know why you are doing this, since it does not even help IKE. It is giving more and more the feeling that IKE's following is cult-like, which is one of the reasons I originally left this thread.
If now you feel I am defending Tom, you are wrong; in fact if you read my last post I was actually a bit bothered that Tom pulled my name into this and I had to correct some of his comments; although I did agree with some of his positions.
I looked at your attack on Tom, similar to that in court hearings where the accusor's integrity is being attacked in order to defend the defendant with the useage of subterfuge. Is that your intent?? I hope not.
This thread does not need IKE and TT to continue this arguement, and it sure does not need those to esculate matters, as what you did with your attack on TOM.
I will vouch for Tom's integrity. I originally left this thread quietly since I did not want to harm the integrity since I still respected IKE for his unselfishnish and knowledge he was sharing, but did not care for his presentation.
As I indicated in my post to TOM, anyone who's position in the market is as animated as IKE's will be strongly scrutinized when things go wrong, but also highly praised when things go right. That's normal
Additionally, I am not an expert in the futures, but your comment may not be totally correct. I am checking into it.
Now if you want to pull me into it since I am vouching for Toms's integrity, be my guess but be warned that alot of dirt will come out of it, whereby I will be able to site specific posts to substantiate my position which IKE would not be able to deny.
|
