Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 154.29

-3.2%

2:56 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (102266)	5/26/2011 7:21:33 PM
From: Mr. Sunshine	Read Replies (1) of 197296

<<R&D Expenditures vs. Revenue Growth, 2 years out>> This is an apples to oranges comparison. It should be R&D Expenditures vs Revenues, or R&D Expenditure Growth vs. Revenue Growth. I understand the point the chart is trying to make - that an increase in R&D has not produced corresponding revenue increases 2 years later - but do not agree with the methodology or conclusion. A simple comparison of R&D expenditures as a % of Revenue (2 years out or not) would be more useful. Where did this chart come from? Is this an evaluation methodology I have not heard of? I am not convinced, but remain open minded if someone wants to take the time to enlighten me.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next