International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Albert V who wrote (26690)	11/16/1997 1:21:00 PM
From: Daniel M. Whipple	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Albert, Your rage is understandable. Got a lot of it myself. The PR by itself without a clarification from the company is useless. It can not be disected because there is nothing to correlate it to. All the pertinent information was left out. Maybe a PR is not where you try to explain the information. Most companies which have explaining to do on a PR have a conference call to clarify. IPM is not large enough or well known enough to use this avenue. Hold off till we get the Q&A report. It will tell you what is going on. Make your judgement using both. Hope we are in for good news. LOL Daniel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next