SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: donald sew who wrote (28113)11/16/1997 1:29:00 PM
From: C.N.S.  Read Replies (1) of 58727
 
Dear Don,

I seldom post to you, and this is one of those rare times that I have chosen to specifically address you. You were intense in your post to Nayson (and you certainly were justied and I wish I could find that intensity when you addressing some others on similar issues), but a few points bother me :

>>I DON'T NEED THIS CULT-LIKE ATMOSPHERE, and for me you are the main reason for my departure once this matter is over. Until IKE steps and advises otherwise, I will also have to assume that he is promoting such CULT-LIKE following.<<

I think you are contradicting yourself when you say you don't like a cult-like atmosphere but expect Ike to intervene.

Before I proceed further, I wish to clarify that - I don't like emotionalism - I fully supported Kevin's & Lisa's position in their previous situation with Ike and to a large extent, I support TT (as I posted earlier in both the threads) in his current situation with Ike. TSO is one of the only threads that I have followed on SI regularly and I am on other threads only occasionally. I chose to respond to you here and not on "ideas's" cause the air is too thick out there.

Now that I am done with this preamble, I continue,

>>Once I am finished with my comments with you, I will not longer post on this thread.<<
>>for me you (??Nayson??) are the main reason for my departure once this matter is over<<

This was a similar situation some time ago when you "accused" Ike of "attacking you" and feigned hurt and announced that you were not going to post there because of Ike. It was obvious to many that he did not in the least attack you & that you were "manipulating" "Ike's and Idea thread's bad reputation" to play a "victim". The real reason was that you preferred not to associate with Ike. Which, Sir, is no problem whatsoever - but why do you not come out and say so and instead indulge in all this tantrum-throwing ? You remained mum about the previous situation till this weekend, while in the meantime, scores of people on that thread had virtually "begged" you for forgiveness. Well, well !!!!

I find a definite pattern to the people you choose to throw a tantrum at (Ike, Nancy Ho etc etc) and THAT, Lovely Lisa, is VERY SCAREY !!!

Feel free to get "hurt" by this post and threaten to not post here or anywhere else etc etc. It doesn't bother me at all. But what does bother me is that I am sure Kevin, lisa, tt and other regulars on this thread enjoy your posts on this thread and will much rather miss me than you. So my request to you is, should you get mighy upset by this, consider me as one of "the ideas guys", vent your spleen at me, not at TSO.

Regards and have a great weekend,
Shivu

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext